The most important service rendered by the press and the magazines is that of educating people to approach printed matter with distrust.
Samuel Butler

ANGRY MOB

We read the papers everyday


Your Ad Here

Notice
  • Guest user account is not properly configured. Please set 'Username of Guest' option to the Username of registered user. guest_username="guest"

    --
    yvComment solution, version="1.24.0"
Keeping the extreme views out of a proportional voting system PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 07 May 2010 15:37
I was reading another blog earlier dealing with this issue and there were some interesting views from other European systems: "The Swedish voting system is basically a full multi-party, proportionate system, but in order to avoid deadlocks there are two tweaks, first an odd number of seats in the parliament, and a 4% bar for getting a seat in the parliament." "The 4% bar means that in order to get a seat in the parliament a party must get at least 4% of the votes. This rule stabilises the parliment and keeps most of the small fringe parties out ( revolutionary communisst/nazis/ultra religious). The parliament has been lead by different coalitions for many decades now and while there are often negotiations needed to form the coalition that is typically done in a few days when only larger parties are involved." The full blog post and the comments are well worth a read, after all this isn't a uniquely British problem, all democratic system face such problems: http://gowers.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/is-the-british-voting-system-fair/
 
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack