HRA nonsense

Main Menu

Latest Comments

Comments

Crayfish issue not as bad as Canada.

Yes. Absolutely. What you said.

There is no debate here when people argue from false premises

Popular All Time

Search this site

Daily Mail Related Links

Fun Links

Writers / Thinkers

Tags

amanda platell daily mail liz jones melanie philips peter hitchens richard littlejohn about advertiser affair again anger angry another asylum attack barack being best blame body boob boyle brain brigade britain british broken campaign candidate cant cause change character children column comment compassion consequence conservative continue criminal dacre daily dale dead death defend deserve despair destroy difference different disabled disaster dont editor elf 'n' safety even ever evidence face facebook favour fear freak free friday from fury georgina gervai going gone good griffin hate hatred have having headline health hitchen holiday homophobia hypocrisy iain idea ignoring immigrant immigration intolerance irony jone journalism journalism just kill killer killing liberal like link littlejohn love mail make marriage media mistake moir more muslim mythical nazi nick obama outcome outrage over part paul peter place please police poll pres racism racist rape real really report reveal richard ricky right safety same scare shit shock show slack some spot statistic stop story strike support susan swine tabloid tabloid take talk terrible terror than that they think thinking through today torture trigger utter very victorian want week white will with without work world worse wrong year your yourself

Your Ad Here

Stats since 7/04/09

View blog authority

Notice

Guest user account is not properly configured. Please set 'Username of Guest' option to the Username of registered user. guest_username="guest"

--
yvComment solution, version="1.24.0"

HRA nonsense

Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:12

"European Charter on Human Rights: the legal system used in the UK (although there are variations in Scotland) is Habeas Corpus" ...no, Habeas Corpus is a procedure within the common law. "The integration and implementation of the ECHR unfortunately did not sufficiently anticipate the effects of differences in legal systems within the EU" I'm sorry, but this is utter tosh. It's a piece of legislation like any other. Since it appears that I must: source please. Or indeed a slightly more detailed explanation than this - as it stands this little snippet is very wordy yet actually conveys no message at all. "Our policy is to draw up a new Bill of Rights incorporating both the ECHR and UN Charter on Human Rights but in a way which is appropriate to our own legal system." Again: how? As ever, nice and wordy, legally unsubstantiated, and devoid of any actual fact. To re-iterate: how is the HRA inappropriate for the common law? "the current Act is falling short and causing unnecessary tensions in our communities." Ditto. Less rhetoric more substance please.

This is a comment on "Emma Moore, Conservative Candidate for Ogmore and her dishonest leaflets"

ANGRY MOB

We read the papers everyday