In reply to 'not a Daily Mail reader'

Main Menu

Latest Comments

Comments

Crayfish issue not as bad as Canada.

Yes. Absolutely. What you said.

There is no debate here when people argue from false premises

Popular All Time

Search this site

Daily Mail Related Links

Fun Links

Writers / Thinkers

Tags

amanda platell daily mail liz jones melanie philips peter hitchens richard littlejohn about advertiser affair again anger angry another asylum attack barack being best blame body boob boyle brain brigade britain british broken campaign candidate cant cause change character children column comment compassion consequence conservative continue criminal dacre daily dale dead death defend deserve despair destroy difference different disabled disaster dont editor elf 'n' safety even ever evidence face facebook favour fear freak free friday from fury georgina gervai going gone good griffin hate hatred have having headline health hitchen holiday homophobia hypocrisy iain idea ignoring immigrant immigration intolerance irony jone journalism journalism just kill killer killing liberal like link littlejohn love mail make marriage media mistake moir more muslim mythical nazi nick obama outcome outrage over part paul peter place please police poll pres racism racist rape real really report reveal richard ricky right safety same scare shit shock show slack some spot statistic stop story strike support susan swine tabloid tabloid take talk terrible terror than that they think thinking through today torture trigger utter very victorian want week white will with without work world worse wrong year your yourself

Your Ad Here

Stats since 7/04/09

View blog authority

Notice

Guest user account is not properly configured. Please set 'Username of Guest' option to the Username of registered user. guest_username="guest"

--
yvComment solution, version="1.24.0"

In reply to 'not a Daily Mail reader'

Written by Uponnothing

Wednesday, 29 July 2009 14:43

Actually, I am guilty of plagiarism there, as I copied that line word for word from the Daily Mail! I only added the dashes so that it flowed better in my sentence. This just shows how language can be perceived differently when perhaps you have a certain expectation of what beliefs the writer holds. I understand your point, and to extent I am of course naturally biased - I pick articles that shows the worst of the Daily Mail, not the best. In fairness though I barely have time to cover the worst articles, let alone the good / bad / indifferent. As pointed out by Sophie, I never set out to defend the drug-dealer, I was merely pointing out that this judge seems to be making pretty dubious sweeping statements about society (or 'you people') that seem extraordinarily out of place. No professional should rant and rave a load of old rubbish at work, especially if they know they have a public platform. Sophie, I would be interested in raising a complaint about Judge Trigger because he seems like a bigoted, ignorant shithead who I wouldn't want peoples' futures determined by.

This is a comment on "Judge Ian Trigger: delivering judgement on us all"

ANGRY MOB

We read the papers everyday